The goal of building the proverbial better mousetrap has stoked the imaginations of inventors ever since the philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson observed that doing so would prompt the world to beat a path to the builder’s door.
Today, the expression is used to describe innovations from highway upgrades to high-tech tools as well as the historical advances (including a literal mousetrap) featured in a Smithsonian exhibit on U.S. patent history.
It’s also an apt description of what DuPont Personal Protection has done for secondary flame-resistant (SFR) garments with the introduction of the Tyvek® 400 SFR, says Daniel Bowen, the company’s Northeast regional sales manager.
Commonly worn by workers performing maintenance on oil and gas refineries and petrochemical plants during shutdowns, disposable secondary-flame resistant garments are designed to protect more expensive primary flame-resistant garments from particles, oils and greases that might render them unusable.
Secondary items shouldn’t be worn without primary flame-resistant garments— such as DuPont’s Nomex®—that are designed to protect wearers from flames and thermal burns, underneath, the company notes.
Workplace Fire Injuries
Providing appropriate flame-resistant clothing for workers is a priority for U.S. employers since burn injuries pose a persistent risk. Labor Department statistics show 107 workers died in fires and explosions in 2022, the most recent year for which statistics were available, down 7 percent from 2018.
The National Safety Council, which publishes workplace injuries every two years, reported 3,190 injuries from fires and explosions in 2021 and 2022.
While the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration sets overall requirements for flame-resistant clothing, more specific guidelines for secondary flame-resistant garments are covered by the American National Standards Institute.
The key qualification is that SFR garments don’t contribute to burn injuries or hinder the protection offered by primary flame-resistant gear, Bowen says. When testing them, their capacity to self-extinguish once a worker escapes a fire is more relevant than resistance to charring.
Talk to Us!
Leave a reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *